2 comments on “On The Subject Of GMO

  1. I read the article by “the editors” . It speaks of profit, not health and science. You’re doing nothing to give us truth about a serious topic. Stick to the Arts. Listen again to the man you call a quack…

    • I’m sorry you feel that way. I am doing my best to do just that – give the truth. Some won’t hear it because their beliefs cloud their otherwise good judgement. I’m very familiar with Huber. His assertions are based on belief, not evidence. I will be on a panel with him and others via skype at an upcoming sustainable farming symposium in Idaho. I look forward to it.

      The science is clear: there is NO evidence that GMOs pose any more danger than conventional foods. https://sleuth4health.wordpress.com/2013/07/25/is-gm-food-safe-experts-around-the-globe-answer/

      Flame retardants are MUCH more dangerous and toxic and no one seems to pay them a moment’s notice. We’re barking up the wrong tree with GMOs.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s